The 1st perfomance from our group!
Hello everyone! May I start with the bad news?
Quarantine extended in our city until April 30. :(
I stay at home and breathe fresh air only on my balcony. And the good news is I was so tired of it that I went for a walk yesterday with my friend and we enjoyed the coffee from my favorite coffee shop. It was unforgettable!
So, we start to presented our speech of Public Speech and ... yesss, we should to presented it with a help of ZOOM.
Zoom is the leader in modern enterprise video communications, with an easy, reliable cloud platform for video and audio conferencing, chat, and webinars.
And the task is to evaluate my groupmate's speech. The first perfomance was about Stage Fright and the speaker was Polina Andriyanova!
Quarantine extended in our city until April 30. :(
I stay at home and breathe fresh air only on my balcony. And the good news is I was so tired of it that I went for a walk yesterday with my friend and we enjoyed the coffee from my favorite coffee shop. It was unforgettable!
So, we start to presented our speech of Public Speech and ... yesss, we should to presented it with a help of ZOOM.
Zoom is the leader in modern enterprise video communications, with an easy, reliable cloud platform for video and audio conferencing, chat, and webinars.
And the task is to evaluate my groupmate's speech. The first perfomance was about Stage Fright and the speaker was Polina Andriyanova!
Evaluating Chart
1. Introduction: ( 10 points)
·
What
technique(s) was used in the introduction? I think the introduction was missing, but Polina tried to make a startling statement, but it was not enough
·
Any
link-element? I think it was the information about COMMUNICATION
·
Was
the thesis statement given? The thesis was given, but not clear.
·
How
effective was the introduction?
Very effective
10, 9, 8
|
Average
7, 6, 5
|
Not effective
4, 3, 2, 1
|
Max 10 pts
6
|
2. Body:
(10 points)
·
How
well structured was the information presented?
Highly organized
10, 9, 8
|
Some organized
7, 6, 5, 4
|
None
3, 2, 1
|
·
What
organizational structure was used in the body of the speech? The speaker used organizational patterns.
·
How
understandable was the information (was it clearly explained)?
Very good
10, 9, 8
|
Had some problems
7, 6, 5, 4
|
Had major problems
3, 2, 1
|
·
Quality
of point-support (appropriateness, completeness, variety)
Lots of
10, 9, 8
|
Some
7, 6, 5, 4
|
Almost no
3, 2, 1
|
·
Use
of facts, illustrations, examples, stories. I would like to hear more examples. E.g. life examples
Lots of
10, 9, 8
|
Some
7, 6, 5
|
None
4, 3, 2, 1
|
·
Was
it coherent? The speech was quite coherent, I may say.
10 9 8
7 6 5 4 3
2 1
|
Max 10 pts
7
|
3. Conclusion: (10 points)
·
What
technique(s) was used in the conclusion? The speaker gave some tips for the audience that can help them.
·
Were
all the steps followed (summary, action, emotional appeal?) I think, yes, but, again, I did not have enough life examples and emotions.
·
How
effective was the conclusion?
Very effective
10, 9, 8
|
Average
7, 6, 5
|
Not effective
4, 3, 2, 1
|
Max 10 pts
6
|
|
Total points:
30
|
Given points: 19
|
|||
Very interesting speech rating! I hope that you will get the best result for your speech!
ОтветитьУдалить