The 1st perfomance from our group!

Hello everyone! May I start with the bad news?

Quarantine extended in our city until April 30. :(

I stay at home and breathe fresh air only on my balcony. And the good news is I was so tired of it that I went for a walk yesterday with my friend and we enjoyed the coffee from my favorite coffee shop. It was unforgettable!



Spichka” Public Speaking Club | American Cultural Center

So, we start to presented our speech of Public Speech and ... yesss, we should to presented it with a help of ZOOM.
Zoom is the leader in modern enterprise video communications, with an easy, reliable cloud platform for video and audio conferencing, chat, and webinars.

And the task is to evaluate my groupmate's speech. The first perfomance was about Stage Fright and the speaker was Polina Andriyanova!


Evaluating Chart

1. Introduction: ( 10 points)
·         What technique(s) was used in the introduction? I think the introduction was missing, but Polina tried to make a startling statement, but it was not enough
·         Any link-element? I think it was the information about COMMUNICATION
·         Was the thesis statement given? The thesis was given, but not clear. 
·         How effective was the introduction?
Very effective
10, 9, 8
Average
7, 6, 5
Not effective
4, 3, 2, 1
Max 10 pts
        6

2. Body:  (10 points)
·         How well structured was the information presented? 
Highly organized
10, 9, 8
Some organized
7, 6, 5, 4
None
3, 2, 1
·         What organizational structure was used in the body of the speech? The speaker used organizational patterns. 


·         How understandable was the information (was it clearly explained)?
Very good
10, 9, 8
Had some problems
7, 6, 5, 4
Had major problems
3, 2, 1
·         Quality of point-support (appropriateness, completeness, variety)
Lots of
10, 9, 8
Some
7, 6, 5, 4
Almost no
3, 2, 1
·         Use of facts, illustrations, examples, stories. I would like to hear more examples. E.g.  life examples
Lots of
10, 9, 8
Some
7, 6, 5
None
4, 3, 2, 1
·         Was it coherent? The speech was quite coherent, I may say. 
10  9  8  7  6  5  4  3  2  1

Max 10 pts
      7

3. Conclusion: (10 points)
·         What technique(s) was used in the conclusion? The speaker gave some tips for the audience that can help them. 
·         Were all the steps followed (summary, action, emotional appeal?) I think, yes, but, again, I did not have enough life examples and emotions. 
·         How effective was the conclusion?
Very effective
10, 9, 8
Average
7, 6, 5
Not effective
4, 3, 2, 1
Max 10 pts
       6


Total points:  30
Given points: 19





Комментарии

Отправить комментарий

Популярные сообщения из этого блога

It's time for challenges!

Анкета "Ваш уровень ораторского мастерства"

Quotes